LiDAR_VTrans_TSIrene_2012

Metadata also available as

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Fugro EarthData, Inc.
Publication_Date: 20120709
Title: LiDAR_VTrans_TSIrene_2012
Edition: 2012
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Montpelier VT 05633-5001
Publisher: Vermont Agency of Transportation
Other_Citation_Details: Tile Structure - LiDAR
Online_Linkage: N/A
Description:
Abstract:
This metadata record describes the acquisition and production of LiDAR covering seven sections of highway corridors in the State of Vermont for the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans). LiDAR terrain points were generated with a minimum density of 2- 4 points per square meter (ppsm).
Purpose:
The State of Vermont, through VTrans required the acquisition of high resolution orthophotography and LiDAR for specific highway corridors damaged during Tropical Storm Irene on August 27-28, 2011. The orthophotography and terrain data will be utilized in the planning and design of infrastructure repairs.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20120418
Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: Irregular
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -72.987407
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -72.378146
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 44.140488
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 42.843345
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: LiDAR
Theme_Keyword: Terrain
Theme_Keyword: Bare-Earth
Theme_Keyword: Aerial Acquisition
Theme_Keyword: FLI-MAP
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: Geographic Names Information System
Place_Keyword: USA
Place_Keyword: Vermont
Place_Keyword: None
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
VTrans and the State of VT make no representations of any kind, including but not limited to the warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use, nor are any such warranties to be implied with respect to the data. For all products, services, Internet Website, and data, excepting digital or hardcopy orthophotography collected through the VT Tax Department's Mapping Program, the direct, non-value added, reproduction of State of Vermont or VCGI's products, services, Website, or data with intent to sell is prohibited without the written consent of VCGI. For all digital or hardcopy orthophotography collected through the VT Tax Department's Mapping Program, copying, reprinting, duplicating, selling or attempting to sell is prohibited. Vermont Statute 32 V.S.A. § 3409 permits a fine, not to exceed $1,000.00, for any person violating this prohibition.

Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: VT Center for Geographic Information
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: Mailing and Physical Address
Address: 58 South Main Street, Suite 2
City: Waterbury
State_or_Province: VT
Postal_Code: 05676
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone:
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: None
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: info@vcgi.org
Hours_of_Service: 9am - 5pm, M-F

Data_Set_Credit: Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans)

Security_Information:
Security_Classification_System: N/A
Security_Classification: Unclassified
Security_Handling_Description: N/A

Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
This data has been produced to have a vertical accuracy that meets or exceeds a verified ASPRS Class I vertical accuracy of +/- 9.25 cm RMSE and 18.2 cm at 95% confidence level according to the NSSDA standard methodology.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Compliance with the accuracy standard was ensured by the collection of ground control and the establishment of a GPS base station. The following checks were performed: 1) The LiDAR data accuracy was validated by performing a full boresight adjustment and then checking it against the ground control prior to generating a digital terrain model (DTM) or other products. 2) LiDAR elevation data was validated through an inspection of edge matching and visual inspection for quality (artifact removal).
Completeness_Report:
The following methods are used to ensure LiDAR data accuracy: 1) Use of a ground control network utilizing GPS survey techniques; 2) Use of airborne GPS and IMU in conjunction with the acquisition of LiDAR; and 3) Measurement of quality control ground survey points within the finished product. The following software is used for the validation: 1) Terrascan and 2) Fugro EarthData, Inc. Proprietary Software.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
This data has been produced to have a horizontal accuracy meeting ASPRS Class I horizontal accuracy for 1:600.
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
This data has been produced to have a vertical accuracy that meets or exceeds a verified ASPRS Class I vertical accuracy of +/- 9.25 cm RMSE and 18.2 cm at 95% confidence level according to the NSSDA standard methodology.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans)
Publication_Date: 20120515
Title: GPS Survey for photo control
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: model
Type_of_Source_Media: onLine
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20120419
Ending_Date: 20120515
Source_Currentness_Reference: Publication Date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Ground Control
Source_Contribution:
VTrans successfully established ground control for the project area. A total of 31 ground control points were acquired using GPS for both vertical and horizontal coordinate values.
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Fugro EarthData, Inc.
Publication_Date: 20120418
Title: VTrans LiDAR; FLI-MAP Aerial Acquisition
Type_of_Source_Media: External hard drive
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Multiple_Dates/Times:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20120407
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20120413
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20120414
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20120415
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20120416
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20120417
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20120418
Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Aerial Acquisition
Source_Contribution:
Fugro EarthData, Inc. collected FLI-MAP derived LiDAR over the following Vermont corridors: VT-100 (north) from US-4 intersection in Killington to Rochester Village, VT-100 (south) from Plymouth to US-4 intersection in West Bridgewater, VT-9 Marlboro to Brattleboro, VT-12A Randolph to Northfield, VT-11 Andover to Chester, US-4 Rutland City to Hartford, and VT-107 Stockbridge to Bethel; with a minimum of 2- 4 points per square meter (ppsm). The collection for the entire project was accomplished on April 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, 2012; 178 flight lines were acquired in 9 lifts.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
All acquired LiDAR data went through a preliminary review to assure that complete coverage was obtained and that there were no gaps between flight lines before the flight crew left the project site. Once back in the office, the data was run through a comprehensive quality check to ensure that it is complete, uncorrupted, and that the entire project area has been covered without gaps between flight lines. There are essentially three steps to this processing: 1) GPS/IMU Processing - Airborne GPS and IMU data was processed using the airport GPS base station data, which was available to the flight crew upon landing the plane. This ensured the integrity of all the mission data. These results were also used to perform the initial LiDAR system calibration test. 2) Raw LiDAR Data Processing - Technicians processed the raw data to LAS format flight lines with full resolution output before performing QC. A starting configuration file is used in this process, which contains the latest calibration parameters for the sensor. The technicians also generated flight line trajectories for each of the flight lines during this process. 3) Verification of Coverage and Data Quality - Technicians checked flight line trajectory files to ensure completeness of acquisition for project flight lines, calibration lines, and cross flight lines. The intensity images were generated for the entire lift. The technician visually checked the intensity images against the acquisition boundary to ensure full coverage to the 500 meter buffer beyond the project boundary. The technician also thoroughly reviewed the data for any gaps in project area. The technician generated a sample TIN surface to ensure no anomalies were present in the data. Turbulence was inspected for and if it affected the quality of the data, the flight line was rejected and reflown. The technician also evaluated the achieved post spacing against project specified post spacing.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Raw LiDAR Data
Process_Date: 20120427
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: Verified LiDAR Data
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Fugro EarthData, Inc.
Contact_Person: Becky Jordan
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 7320 Executive Way
City: Frederick
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 21704
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (301) 948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (301) 963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: bjordan@fugro.com
Hours_of_Service: Monday to Friday 8:30am to 5:00pm EST
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The boresight for each lift was done individually as the solution may change slightly from lift to lift. The following steps describe the Raw Data Processing and Boresight process: 1) Technician processed the raw data to LAS format flight lines using the final GPS/IMU solution. This LAS data set was used as source data for boresight. 2) Technician used Fugro proprietary and commercial software to calculate initial boresight adjustment angles based on sample areas selected in the lift. These areas cover calibration flight lines collected in the lift, cross tie and production flight lines. These areas are well distributed in the lift coverage and cover multiple terrain types that are necessary for boresight angle calculation. The technician then analyzed the result and made any necessary additional adjustment until it is acceptable for the mini project. 3) Once the boresight angle calculation is complete for the sample areas, the adjusted settings were applied to all of the flight lines of the lift and checked for consistency. The technician utilized commercial and proprietary software packages to analyze the matching between flight line overlaps for the entire lift to ensure that systematic errors were minimized for the lift and the results met the project specifications. 4) Once all lifts were completed with boresight adjustment individually, the technician checked and corrected the vertical misalignment of all flight lines and also the matching between data and ground truth. 5) The technician ran a final vertical accuracy check of the boresighted flight lines against the surveyed check points after the z correction. The result was analyzed against the project specified accuracy to make sure it meets the project requirements.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Verified LiDAR Data
Process_Date: 20120531
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: Boresighted LiDAR Data
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Fugro EarthData, Inc.
Contact_Person: Becky Jordan
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 7320 Executive Way
City: Frederick
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 21704
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (301) 948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (301) 963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: bjordan@fugro.com
Hours_of_Service: Monday to Friday 8:30am to 5:00pm EST
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Once boresighting is complete for the project, the project was set up for automatic classification first. The LiDAR data was cut to production tiles. The flight line overlap points, Noise points and Ground points were classified automatically in this process. Fugro EarthData, Inc. has developed a unique method for processing LiDAR data to identify and re-classify elevation points falling on vegetation, building, and other above ground structures into separate data layers. The steps are as follows: 1) Fugro EarthData, Inc. utilized commercial software as well as proprietary software for automatic filtering. The parameters used in the process were customized for each terrain type to obtain optimum results. 2) Once the automated filtering was completed, the files were run through a visual inspection to ensure that the filtering was not too aggressive or not aggressive enough. In cases where the filtering was too aggressive and important terrain features were filtered out, the data was either run through a different filter within local area or was corrected during the manual filtering process. 3) Interactive editing was completed in visualization software that provides manual and automatic point classification tools. Fugro EarthData, Inc. utilized commercial and proprietary software for this process. Vegetation and artifacts remaining after automatic data post-processing were reclassified manually through interactive editing. The hard edges of ground features that were automatically filtered out during the automatic filtering process were brought back into ground class during manual editing. The technician reviewed the LiDAR points with color shaded TINs for anomalies in ground class during interactive filtering. 4) All LAS tiles went through peer review after the first round of interactive editing was finished. This helps to catch misclassification that may have been missed by the interactive editing. 5) Upon the completion of the manual editing and peer review, and finalization of bare earth filtering, all tiles went through another final automated classification routine. This process ensures only the required classifications are used in the final product (all points classified into any temporary classes during manual editing were re-classified into the project specified classifications). 6) Once manual inspection, QC, and final autofilter is complete for the LiDAR tiles, the LAS data was packaged to the project specified tiling scheme, clipped to the project boundary and LAS delivery format. It was also reprojected to Vermont State Plane, FIPS4400; NAD83 (CORS96), meters; NAVD88 (GEOID09), meters. The file header was formatted to meet project specification with File Source ID assigned. This Classified Point Cloud product was used for the generation of derived products. This product was delivered in fully compliant LAS v1.2, Point Record Format 1 with Adjusted Standard GPS Time. Georeference information was included in all LAS file headers. Intensity values and point color were included for each point. Each tile has a unique File Source ID assigned. The Point Source ID matches to the flight line ID in flight trajectory files. The following classification was included: Category 1 Unclassified and Category 2 Ground/Bare Earth.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Boresighted LiDAR Data
Process_Date: 20120709
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: Classified LiDAR Point Cloud Data
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Fugro EarthData, Inc.
Contact_Person: Becky Jordan
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 7320 Executive Way
City: Frederick
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 21704
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (301) 948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (301) 963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: bjordan@fugro.com
Hours_of_Service: Monday to Friday 8:30am to 5:00pm EST
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Made RAW data available from data delivery to VTRANS
Process_Date: 20130311
Process_Time: Unknown
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mike Brouillette
Contact_Organization: VCGI
Contact_Position: Snr GIS Prj Manager
Cloud_Cover: 0

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Point
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Point

Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: State Plane Coordinate System 1983
State_Plane_Coordinate_System:
SPCS_Zone_Identifier: FIPS 4400
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999964
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -72.500000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 42.500000
False_Easting: 500000.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 1
Ordinate_Resolution: 1
Planar_Distance_Units: Meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83, CORS96)
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222
Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Altitude_System_Definition:
Altitude_Datum_Name: North American Vertical Datum of 1988
Altitude_Resolution: 1
Altitude_Distance_Units: Meters
Altitude_Encoding_Method:
Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates

Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: VT Center for Geographic Information
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 58 South Main Street, Suite 2
City: Waterbury
State_or_Province: Vermont
Postal_Code: 05676
Country: UNITED STATES
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (802) 882-3000
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (802) 882-3001
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: info@vcgi.org
Hours_of_Service: 9am - 5pm, M-F
Distribution_Liability:
VCGI, VTrans and the State of VT make no representations of any kind, including but not limited to the warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use, nor are any such warranties to be implied with respect to the data.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: GeoTIFF, ASCII, and LAS
Format_Version_Number: Unknown
Format_Specification: GeoTIFF, ASCII, and LAS
Format_Information_Content: geospatial data
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Offline_Option:
Offline_Media: 1-2Tb external drive
Recording_Format: N/A
Fees: Contact Distributor
Ordering_Instructions: Contact Distributor
Turnaround: Undetermined

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20121211
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Fugro EarthData, Inc.
Contact_Person: Becky Jordan
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 7320 Executive Way
City: Frederick
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 21704
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (301) 948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (301) 963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: bjordan@fugro.com
Hours_of_Service: Monday to Friday 8:30am to 5:00pm EST
Metadata_Date: 20130311
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: VT Center for Geographic Information
Contact_Person: GIS Database Administrator
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: Mailing and Physical Address
Address: 58 South Main Street, Suite 2
City: Waterbury
State_or_Province: VT
Postal_Code: 05676
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone:
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: None
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time


Generated by mp version 2.9.22 on Thu May 25 13:22:17 2023